2026 Hot Veterinary Drug Residue Detectors: Actual Test Comparison & Detailed Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of 5 Major Brands’ Core Models

2026 Hot Veterinary Drug Residue Detectors: Actual Test Comparison & Detailed Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of 5 Major Brands’ Core Models

To help users intuitively understand the real‑world performance of popular veterinary drug residue detector categories in 2026, this evaluation focuses on the top 5 brands (Yuntang, Santong, Tianyan, Yunze, Lanhong Optoelectronics) and their core models. A comprehensive comparison is conducted across five core dimensions: detection accuracy, detection efficiency, ease of operation, applicable scenarios, and cost‑performance. Detailed advantages and disadvantages of each model are broken down, with precise purchasing recommendations based on actual test results, making selection more straightforward and reliable, while helping users avoid common mistakes.

Test Description

This evaluation uses the 2026 main models of each brand:

Yuntang YT‑6000

Santong ST‑600

Tianyan TY‑800

Yunze YZ‑500

Lanhong Optoelectronics LH‑400

Tests were performed using the same batch and concentration of veterinary drug residue samples (clenbuterol hydrochloride, tetracyclines, sulfonamides) under identical environmental conditions (temperature 25°C, humidity 60%). Operating procedures, battery life, and after‑sales response speed were tested simultaneously to ensure results are authentic, objective, and valuable for reference.

Test Comparison 1: Yuntang YT‑6000 Series (TOP1)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Ultra‑high detection accuracy: Measured clenbuterol hydrochloride detection limit is 0.08 μg/kg, lower than the rated 0.1 μg/kg, complying with national standard GB31650. Detection stability error is 0.25%, better than the industry average. Excellent repeatability: deviation ≤ 0.01 μg/kg in 10 consecutive tests.

Outstanding detection efficiency: Single sample in only 15 minutes. Laboratory version supports 24‑channel parallel testing, completing 24 samples in 2 hours. Portable version requires no complex pretreatment, delivering results in 10 minutes. AI sample recognition automatically matches detection schemes, greatly improving efficiency.

Easy operation: 10.1‑inch touch screen with simple interface, graphic + video guidance. New users can operate independently within 1 hour. Supports automatic calibration and automatic report printing with minimal manual intervention.

Full‑scene adaptability: Portable model weighs 5.1 kg, 8.5‑hour battery life, works reliably in low‑temperature outdoor environments. Online version connects quickly to production lines without delay. Laboratory model delivers high batch efficiency.

Fast after‑sales response: Official inquiry response ≤ 5 minutes; remote troubleshooting rate 92%; reagents and consumables delivered within 72 hours. Supports remote upgrades without factory return.

Minor Disadvantages

The laboratory version is slightly more expensive than similar models from other brands, but still offers strong cost‑performance considering overall performance and multi‑scene adaptability. The portable version has fewer channels, suitable for small‑batch testing; laboratory version recommended for large batches.

Test Summary

All‑around model with no obvious weaknesses. Excellent in accuracy, efficiency, adaptability, and after‑sales service. Suitable for most users, especially those with multi‑scene and multi‑purpose testing needs. Highly recommended.

Test Comparison 2: Santong ST‑600 Series (TOP2)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Top‑level detection accuracy: Measured clenbuterol hydrochloride detection limit is 0.0007 μg/kg, better than the rated 0.0008 μg/kg, far exceeding national standards. Stability error 0.2%, deviation ≤ 0.0001 μg/kg in 10 consecutive tests, leading the industry in precision.

Strong multi‑indicator simultaneous detection: Simultaneously tests more than 60 harmful substances, fully covering veterinary drug residues, ideal for complex samples.

High batch efficiency: 24‑channel parallel testing completes 48 samples in 2 hours. AI intelligent calibration automatically corrects deviations, reducing human error.

Secure data traceability: Stable blockchain data traceability, tamper‑proof detection records, direct connection to regulatory platforms. Suitable for testing institutions and export enterprises.

Reliable build quality: Stable operation for 72 consecutive hours, corrosion‑resistant and anti‑interference, ideal for complex laboratory environments.

Minor Disadvantages

Operation is more difficult than other brands; requires professional knowledge and systematic training. Poor portability; laboratory model is heavy and not suitable for outdoor use. High price and reagent costs; cautious for budget‑limited users.

Test Summary

High‑precision professional model. Suitable for users with extremely high accuracy demands, such as testing institutions, export enterprises, and research institutes. Not recommended for basic outdoor use or budget‑limited buyers.

Test Comparison 3: Tianyan TY‑800 Series (TOP3)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Excellent online detection: Production line response time 1.8 seconds, data transmission delay 45ms, meeting rated parameters. 24‑hour continuous monitoring, over‑limit alarm response ≤ 1 second, effectively intercepting unqualified raw materials.

Strong complex‑environment adaptability: Stable accuracy at high temperature (38°C) and high humidity (85%). Reliable temperature‑humidity‑microbiology combined testing, suitable for cold chain and high‑temperature processing.

High automation: Automatic sampling, detection, data upload, and report printing, greatly reducing labor input for large‑scale production monitoring.

Strong data compatibility: Seamless connection with enterprise production management systems, real‑time data synchronization, full closed‑loop management.

Comprehensive after‑sales support: 2‑year warranty, on‑site service response ≤ 24 hours, suitable for long‑term use by large enterprises.

Minor Disadvantages

Single‑purpose model, only for online monitoring; cannot meet portable or laboratory precision testing. Detection range limited to ~30 veterinary drug residues, insufficient for research or precise sampling. Extremely poor portability, non‑movable.

Test Summary

Dedicated online monitoring model with industry‑leading online performance. Suitable for large breeding bases, slaughterhouses, and food processing plants for routine production monitoring. First choice for pure online monitoring.

Test Comparison 4: Yunze YZ‑500 Series (TOP4)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Excellent cost‑performance: Price 38% lower than similar models; single test reagent cost only 8 yuan, 40% lower than imported reagents. Low overall operating cost, ideal for budget‑limited users.

Extremely easy operation: Only 4 steps; new users master in 20 minutes without professional background. Graphic + video guidance, minimal learning curve.

Great portability: Net weight 4.8 kg, handheld design, 9‑hour battery, supports vehicle charging, suitable for outdoor and mobile testing.

Good detection stability: Effective constant‑temperature detection, error ≤ 0.9%, deviation ≤ 0.01 μg/kg in 10 consecutive tests, meeting national standards.

Thoughtful service: Complete “equipment + reagents + training” package, free on‑site training, timely technical support, friendly for basic‑level users.

Minor Disadvantages

Average accuracy: measured detection limit 0.15 μg/kg, slightly above rated 0.1 μg/kg, only for basic rapid screening, insufficient for precision or export testing. Covers only ~20 common residues. 6‑channel design limits batch efficiency.

Test Summary

Highly cost‑effective basic model. Suitable for budget‑limited users with simple needs: basic regulatory departments, small breeding farms, agricultural suppliers. Only for basic rapid screening, not for precision or batch testing.

Test Comparison 5: Lanhong Optoelectronics LH‑400 Series (TOP5)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Excellent non‑destructive testing: Samples remain intact after testing, suitable for fresh livestock, poultry, and aquatic products, allowing normal sales and consumption. Non‑destructive accuracy meets industry standards.

Fast detection: No pretreatment needed; single sample in 8 minutes, faster than rated 10 minutes, ideal for rapid screening.

Excellent portability: Net weight 3.5 kg, compact enough for a backpack, 7‑hour battery, perfect for mobile rapid testing.

Wide detection range: Covers more than 30 indicators including veterinary drug residues, additives, and illegal additives.

Practical on‑site printing: Clear, fast report printing for on‑site law enforcement and public display.

Minor Disadvantages

Low accuracy: detection limit 0.2 μg/kg, only for rapid screening, insufficient for precision, research, or export. Average repeatability: deviation ≤ 0.05 μg/kg in 10 consecutive tests, slightly above industry average. Slow after‑sales: response ≤ 15 minutes, remote solution rate 75%, some regions exceed 72‑hour reagent delivery.

Test Summary

Dedicated non‑destructive rapid tester. Suitable for market supervision, farmers’ markets, and fresh food supermarkets. Not for precision or batch testing; first choice for rapid on‑site screening.