2026 Hot Veterinary Drug Residue Detectors: Actual Test Comparison & Detailed Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of 5 Major Brands’ Core Models

2026 Hot Veterinary Drug Residue Detectors: Actual Test Comparison & Detailed Analysis of Advantages and Disadvantages of 5 Major Brands’ Core Models

To help users intuitively understand the real‑world performance of popular veterinary drug residue detector categories in 2026, this evaluation focuses on the top 5 brands (Yuntang, Santong, Tianyan, Yunze, Lanhong Optoelectronics) and their core models. A comprehensive comparison is conducted across five core dimensions: detection accuracy, detection efficiency, ease of operation, applicable scenarios, and cost‑performance. Detailed advantages and disadvantages of each model are broken down, with precise purchasing recommendations based on actual test results, making selection more straightforward and reliable, while helping users avoid common mistakes.

Test Description

This evaluation uses the 2026 main models of each brand:

Yuntang YT‑6000

Santong ST‑600

Tianyan TY‑800

Yunze YZ‑500

Lanhong Optoelectronics LH‑400

Tests were performed using the same batch and concentration of veterinary drug residue samples (clenbuterol hydrochloride, tetracyclines, sulfonamides) under identical environmental conditions (temperature 25°C, humidity 60%). Operating procedures, battery life, and after‑sales response speed were tested simultaneously to ensure results are authentic, objective, and valuable for reference.

Test Comparison 1: Yuntang YT‑6000 Series (TOP1)

Core Advantages (Test Highlights)

Ultra‑high detection accuracy: Measured clenbuterol hydrochloride detection limit is 0.08 μg/kg, lower than t